How long should ‘bad press’ stick around?

New York Times Public Editor Clark Hoyt reports that old news stories are making life miserable for people, even if the information they contain is outdated or just plain wrong.

People are coming forward at the rate of roughly one a day to complain that they are being embarrassed, are worried about losing or not getting jobs, or may be losing customers because of the sudden prominence of old news articles that contain errors or were never followed up.

[Continue reading When Bad News Follows You]

Yet another reason to get your facts straight. On the other hand, should even correct stories be thrust to the forefront by optimized search code such as that utilized by the Times? If you host a college party that gets raided, and police find a 17-yeard-old freshman there, should your arrest for “corrupting the morals of a minor” be the first thing people find about you online for the rest of your life? Hoyt is right to raise concern.

[Addendum (8/27): It’s not just the Times who needs to be worried about this.]


0 Responses to “How long should ‘bad press’ stick around?”

  1. Leave a Comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

This blog is maintained by Dr. Matthew M. Reavy as a service to journalism students at the University of Scranton.



August 2007
    Sep »

RSS Jobs from Cyberjournalist

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.

RSS Jobs from Poynter

  • An error has occurred; the feed is probably down. Try again later.
Dunder Mifflin

%d bloggers like this: